Saturday, February 17, 2018

Lent 2018: "First they came for the Muslims...."


            After being stymied the past two years by Islamophobic-Trumpist forces thinly veiled as zoning concerns, the Muslims of Bayonne, New Jersey will finally be able to build their mosque and community center.
            Bayonne, the self-described “Peninsula City,” lies just south of Jersey City in Hudson County.  Surrounded by Newark Bay and Upper New York Bay and separated from Staten Island by the Kill Van Kull to the South, Bayonne used to be a mostly white immigrant working-class town.  Many of those Jewish and Irish-, Polish-, and Italian-descended families still reside there.  So does much of the port-industrial base that originally made the town thrive—now with a light rail that connects commuters to Manhattan and a cruise terminal.  Bayonne contains the grit, the diners, the traffic, the population density, the ethnic melting pot and lack of actual melting, the industrial and post-industrial landscapes, the chip on its shoulder in Manhattan’s shadow, and the unforgettable characters that make it both the stuff of epic Springsteen backdrop and the butt of jokes.  
            I first started my daily trek to Bayonne, across Newark Bay, three and a half years ago as a student-teacher at Marist High School, a little Catholic school at the north edge of town founded by the Marist Brothers.  First opened in 1954, Marist was all boys and almost all white.  As the demographics of Bayonne and nearby cities changed, so did the demographics of the school (also, it is now co-ed).  The brothers whom I befriended in my three years there impressed me in their dedication to their mission, even as fewer and fewer students were Catholic.  Their job, in the spirit of their founder Marcellin, was to serve their kids, no matter their race or their denomination or their socioeconomic status.  A handful of those students were Arab and Muslim.      
**
The Bayonne Muslims had begun renting the basement of St. Henry’s school in 2008 and after seven years, all the while growing in numbers and raising funds, they had purchased their own property—a vacant industrial lot—to build their eventual mosque and community center.  That plan ran into push-back from certain corners of Bayonne.
In February 2016, I received an email from my Veterans for Peace chapter that called on us to support the Bayonne Muslims.  There was to be a zoning board meeting later that week at City Hall on their proposed mosque, and anti-mosque, anti-Muslim forces were going to protest outside.  The Muslim community put out a call to friends in the area to counter-rally.  I told my principal about it, and she encouraged me to wear Marist gear and told me that if anyone asked, “Don’t be afraid to say you work at Marist.”  She got it.  
Muslims and non-Muslims, teachers and students from Bayonne High School, Arab, Indian, Pakistani, white, black, young and old, and a couple veterans all together, we outnumbered the anti-mosque side at least three-to-one.  The air was frigid, but the solidarity warmed hearts and bones, and I figured we would—we shall—overcome.  After all, the mayor and other local representatives were all purportedly behind the mosque.    
The next day at Marist, I broke two rules of the work lunch table: never talk religion and never talk politics.  I did both at the same time.
 **
Eleanor, our beloved long-time secretary, was like a grandmother to our students, mostly students of color.  She listened to them, she looked out for them, she gave them extra bus tickets, and she stored and handed out extra ties and belts.  As a non-adversarial figure, she let students who were in trouble sit in the main office and vent.  She loved them, but it was a tough love.  She challenged them, often with a good joke or zinger as they headed out.  She became a sort-of-grandmother to me as well.  I always had a full lunch, but she often brought extra food for me.  Our school didn’t have much money, but she made sure I had all the supplies I needed.  She gave me, an outsider, the inside intel.  She was the gate and first face of our school, laughing, welcoming, and dishing out wit.  She loved us, and we loved her.
            Which is why the day after the mosque rally upset me so much.
            “I heard you were down at City Hall last night?” she asked.
            “Yes, I was,” I replied.
            “What were you doing down there?”
            “I was down there to support...to stand with...to support our Muslim community.”
            “So, you were on their side?  You like them?”
            “Well...uhh...yes, I think…”
            “What business do you have being down there?  You don’t live in Bayonne.  Why do you care?”
            “Well, I work here.”
            “But you don’t live here.  Why do you support them?”
            “Well, I think they’re being discriminated against in a similar way that the Fitzgibbons’, and then later the Romanos, the Witowskis, and the Cohens were when they moved to Bayonne many years ago.”
            “Well, I don’t like them…(wait for it) what they did on 9/11….”
            I was caught off guard by the turn of the conversation and then the 9/11 bomb.  I felt frustrated.  Blood rushed to my cheeks, and I got small-mouthed.  I tried to reason, but I lost my cool.  I tried for a quick slice of Arab/Muslim/Middle Eastern politics and history with the starter, “Well, fifteen of those particular nineteen Muslims were from Saudi Arabia…” but reason proved no match for the years of pent-up Hannity-ism (presumably) that was to follow: “those people get everything...a stabbing by one of them near that mosque...the noise...the parking...sharia law...9/11 (again)...after what they did….”  Then, it was a segue into the larger O’Reilly narrative: “And, black people—they get everything these days.  Why isn’t there anything for white people?”
Somehow, we got to black people.  The dog-whistle was thrown away—just a whistle now.  This was all with our black and Latino students in the backdrop in the cafeteria, twenty feet away.  And Mo and Souhail, too—two of our Muslim students.    
“I don’t understand why so many people not from Bayonne were there,” she closed.
Finally and angrily, I dropped my v-card: “Well, I joined the navy and this isn’t the type of country that I fought for!”
True, I was (am) a veteran.  But, I didn’t really do any fighting, unless you count the war games and weeks of driving in circles in the middle of the Pacific.  No enemy there, or anywhere else in the globe for that matter, threatened our religious freedom and plurality.  And so, I may not have employed strict logic in that heat of the moment, but the veteran card ended the conversation.  
            The next day, Eleanor brought me in zucchini bread.  She apologized for getting angry and arguing, and so did I.  We hugged, and we never talked about the mosque again.
            Furthermore, I didn’t think too much about the mosque afterwards.  It apparently had the support of the board and city council and the powers-that-be.  Eleanor’s criticism of my outside-agitating did have one grain of truth in it: since the Bayonne mosque was neither my geographic nor my religious home, my privileged activism could afford to be just a flash in the pan and I could go on with my life.  But meanwhile, the mosque was delayed for a year.  
In March 2017, the mosque debate came to a head at a five-hour zoning board meeting that had to take place in the high school auditorium due to the number of attendees.  The board did not have enough votes to approve the requisite variances for the mosque to go ahead.  It seemed like the Trumpist forces had won.  The Muslims lost.    
In January of this year, I took a small group of Notre Dame undergraduates (staying with us during their “Urban Plunge”) to meet with two members of the Bayonne Muslim community at the Broadway Diner.  Without major resentment but with an honest combination of sadness and optimism, Yaser and Ibrahim told us their story.  They updated us on the case.  They informed us that the community was suing the city.  Ibrahim told us how he met some old high school classmates before that five-hour meeting and then was surprised to see them get up and speak against the mosque.  A latent fear not unlike Eleanor’s.
The good news is that the Bayonne mosque is now moving forward.  So is the mosque in the more affluent and suburban Basking Ridge thirty miles west.  The bad news is that the fear and hate continues, both in its latent and active forms.  
**

Sadly, Eleanor died last year of cancer.  Despite her no-longer-secret Limbaugh-ism, I loved her.  She was grandmotherly.  And, her fear was a window into the common, yet unjust fear in most of us white people.  I never did go back to talk to Eleanor about the mosque, about “those people,” or about those other, black people.  About why she felt so threatened.  "Where does it hurt?" Ruby Sales asks.  I probably wouldn’t have changed her mind, but in an inviting way, I could have listened and perhaps pricked and piqued.  I could have perhaps learned more about myself and “my people.”  I could have given her space and felt discomfort for a time, while still not accepting outright falsehoods.  But those are uncomfortable conversations, and I tend to shy away from them and any type of confrontation.  
White supremacy lives on.  It, unfortunately, dies hard.  Not just in the Alabama that almost elected Roy Moore.  But in Eleanor’s New Jersey and my Pennsylvania, too: the Northeast, often Catholic, often Democratic (the insular-peninsular Bayonne is only 8% Republican by the way) version.  “As long as you're south of the Canadian border, you're South,” so said Malcolm X.         
Whiteness is a lie, both historically and psychologically.  White supremacy’s most devastating form has certainly been anti-black racism—blacks by far its most devastated victims.  It has morphed to include anti-Latino xenophobia and, especially since 9/11, Islamophobia.  White supremacy has, for the most part, always resided in the White House, but now it resides there quite proudly.  And sometimes in Bedminster, New Jersey and Mar-a-Lago too.  Its chief law enforcement officer is the "Anglo" Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions.     
  White supremacy has existed from the founding of this country, but how and why does it rear its head now, in its current fashion, enabled by its highest office-holders?  I do not excuse it, but I seek to understand it (in the same way that I do not excuse Islamic-inspired violence but seek to understand it).
Ruby Sales reflects:  
I really think that one of the things that we’ve got to deal with is that how is it that we develop a theology or theologies in a 21st-century capitalist technocracy where only a few lives matter? How do we raise people up from disposability to essentiality? And this goes beyond the question of race. What is it that public theology can say to the white person in Massachusetts who’s heroin-addicted because they feel that their lives have no meaning, because of the trickle-down impact of whiteness in the world today? What do you say to someone who has been told that their whole essence is whiteness and power and domination? And when that no longer exists, then they feel as if they are dying or they get caught up in the throes of death.

Alienation.  Dislocation.  Loss of place in this rigged political, economic system.   White supremacy then becomes the drug itself—historically much deadlier than heroin.  The crude trick of this drug encourages many of its users to support the conman Trump, a chief beneficiary himself of the rigged system.    
It is important to both fight against racism-Islamophobia as it exists and understand the conditions that enable it to flourish.  I just finished teaching a unit on the World Wars.  It is trite but true: alongside Hitler’s vile theories and policies, we must look at the post-Versailles world that proved fertile ground for fascism.  Godwin’s law be damned: just as we fight Trumpism, we fight the deep causes in this long-sickening democracy.  And we the somewhat-winners (for now) in this world order—not as winning as the hedge-fund managers—should reflect on how we have created this fertile ground.  Or if not created, at the least, how we have been too asleep or distracted to recognize this alienation, dislocation, and despair.  In response to this world order, some people shoot themselves in front of City Hall, some blame immigrants, and some (too many) fall for the Trump scam—not the university or the casinos this time but the presidency.  This is not an apology for Eleanor or for white supremacy; nor is this an attempt to reduce the current celebration of racist ignorance to merely economic problems.  To be sure, people of color across the board have suffered even more under the prevailing economic system, and many destitute people the world over do not turn to hate.  But, whether it be the Muslim or the black or the Salvadoran bogeyman, we have to look inside to understand why we need that "other" in the first place.
**

In a beautiful conversation with Rabbi Sarah Bassin and hosted by Krista Tippett, Imam Abdullah Antepli said:
If anybody tells you, “Islam is” whatever; “Christianity says…”; “Judaism believes…”—shy away from these people.  At its best, they are just naïve and uninformed.  At its worst, they are just lying.  No religion of 1.6 billion people, 1,400 years of history, says one thing or believes in one thing or strongly condemns or endorses one thing.  That’s just not—and Christianity is not what New Testament says, only.  Judaism is not what Tanakh says, only.  Islam is not what Qur’an and Muhammad said 1,400 years ago.  Islam is what Muslims do.  You have to see the human manifestation of that text over time, and not just one community, one episode, one time period, but over centuries….

It is so easy and cheap and quick to say, “ISIS is not Muslim.  Hezbollah is not Muslim.  Hamas is not Muslim.” You can’t say that.  As much as they turn my stomach upside-down, as much as I am disgusted, what they represent, I cannot disown it….

Solution is not to divorce ourselves from our moral responsibility.  We have to own this cancer, and we have to defeat it in its theological, ideological ground, and we have to defeat it in its social, political, and cultural ground….

You have to face the ugliness in yourself and in your community.  Most of the moral conversation is this: hitting the chest on the other side, what moral failures that you see.  But the real moral conversation is to put an honest mirror, put yourself into a CT scan, CAT scan, and see what the report is.  What is in you, in your community? How much moral energy and commitment and drive is behind what you do, and how much of this is shallow politics?  That’s why it’s very difficult, but we should absolutely shake the moral imagination of our communities.  We have to improve the level of self-critical moral awakening, moral courage, in our communities.

            At the same time that we fight for the Bayonne Muslims’ right to their mosque and against Muslim bans, we must face the ugliness in our communities and in ourselves.  Righteous indignation at the state of the world, and humble repentance for our role in creating it, at the same time.  This is our perennial, Lenten calling.   

Saturday, January 27, 2018

Monday, January 22, 2018

Update: Captain Nathan Smith v. President Trump

From former shipmate and dear friend Erin (Smith) McAdams:


Dear friends,

Happy New Year, and I hope you are healthy and well. I’m writing to update you on my brother Nathan’s lawsuit concerning the need for a new AUMF (Authorized Use of Military Force), because you’ve expressed interest in the case at some point. The lawsuit is still ongoing, and, despite the national circus that has taken over our public life, is still being covered in various media outlets. I wanted to forward you a few of those podcasts and articles in case you’re interested in the developments.

Just a quick summary reminder of what Nathan’s case is all about: back in the summer of 2015, Nathan, who was then an Army Captain, sued then-President Obama over what he considered was the unconstitutional war against ISIS in Syria. The AUMF that is being used to justify that ongoing war dates back to 2001, and was specifically written to combat Al Qaeda. In Nathan and his legal team’s opinion, our present conflicts go well beyond the scope of Al Qaeda and the 2001 AUMF, and it is time for the President to call on Congress to pass a new AUMF for our current conflicts. Nathan and his team believe this issue is of great importance because it seeks to hold the executive and legislative branches accountable for fulfilling their constitutional duties of examining and debating, rather than accepting as a foregone conclusion, our 17-year state of warfare.

Since there has been no change to the AUMF or our state of conflict since President Obama left office, Nathan’s case is now Capt. Nathan Smith vs. President Trump.
The case was originally rejected in the D.C. courts for lack of standing. Nathan and his team appealed, and a few months ago, the case advanced to oral arguments in the D.C. federal district courts. James, my sister Kelly, brother-in-law Matty, and I all traveled to D.C. to hear the arguments, which was a fascinating experience. Nathan was represented by Professor Bruce Ackerman, professor of law at Yale, and David Remes, a D.C. attorney known for his representation of Guantanamo detainees (the attached photo is of Nathan with Bruce and David). The case was the last on the docket for the day, and the arguments and questioning lasted for over an hour. We are currently awaiting the results of those arguments. If Nathan’s standing is ultimately rejected by that panel of judges, the next stop for appeal will be the Supreme Court.

I’m linking a few of the recent articles, op-eds, and podcasts about the case for your perusal. I especially highly recommend the first podcast, because 1) the soundtrack is epic, 2) it includes Nathan telling his own story in his own words, and 3) it’s gripping and very well-done.

Feel free to forward this email to anyone who might be interested in this issue. Thanks for your interest in what both Nathan and I consider to be a crucial issue of our day (competing with a thousand other crucial issues in this day and age!).

Best to all of you and your families.

Erin

o   A 20-minute gripping and well-done podcast that includes Nathan telling his own story. It also features the input of a Harvard professor of divinity and philosophy, and the foreign policy manager at the national offices of Indivisible.
o   summary of the October court proceedings
o   Op-ed written by Nathan for the blog Task and Purpose, calling specifically on veterans to hold Congress accountable for doing their constitutional duty in debating and voting on war
o   Op-ed written by Nathan directed at members of Congress
o   A 10-minute segment from NPR’s “On Point,” in which Bruce Ackerman (professor of law at Yale and one of Nathan’s legal team members) discusses the relevance of Nathan’s case to the current situation with North Korea and the President’s unconstrained ability to launch nuclear war.

Saturday, December 23, 2017

Remembering the Christmas Truce

"The ones who call the shots won't be among the dead and the lame.
And on each end of the rifle, we're the same."

The same in 2017 as in 1914.  Study, watch, read, listen, pray, and resist, from Veterans for Peace.

Friday, December 22, 2017

Christmas 2017: The Hopes and Fears of All the Years Are Met in Thee Tonight

We finally acknowledge the obvious: that Jerusalem is Israel’s capital.  This is nothing more, or less, than a recognition of reality.  It is also the right thing to do.  It’s something that has to be done. 
-Donald J. Trump, December 6 (Feast of Saint Nicholas), 2017

Pence’s Christmas Pilgrimage Is Canceled.  
-New York Times headline, December 20, 2017

***
“Why are you visiting Israel?” asked the young woman soldier at the Allenby Bridge crossing.
I gave my simple and rehearsed answer: “Religious pilgrimage.”  It was the spring of 2009.
“Are you planning to visit the West Bank?”
“No.”
My friend who worked in the West Bank and would help me get around the next ten days advised me to keep my answers kosher.  
            Religious pilgrimage.  That was also what I told my mom after I bought the plane ticket, and it was partially true—I did want to see some of the Jesus stuff.  However, I had been a student of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since college, and I was much more interested in that modern history than in the sometimes not historically accurate events of 2000 years ago.
            From otherwise gorgeous Mediterranean vistas, I saw with my own eyes how Israeli settlements (called “facts on the ground” by U.S. newspapers and politicians) spread for miles and ate up vast portions of land—always the most arable land, too, with access to water.  These settlements cut wide swaths inside the ‘67 borders, which most Palestinians have accepted as the borders of their future state, even if that future state is well less than half of historic Palestine.  Israel and Palestine are negotiating the division of a pizza, an unofficial tour guide explained, and meanwhile Israel is eating the pizza.  I appreciated his attempt to make us Americans understand, for if we do not understand history we at least understand eating too much.  
Curiosity, chance, and friends of my friend provided me the surreal occasion of playing volleyball on the Mount of Olives next to Mordechai Vanunu one evening during my trip.  The Mount of Olives I knew from years of Catholic education and Catholic sometimes-Bible-reading.  Mordechai Vanunu I did not know.  I learned later that evening that Vanunu had spent eighteen years in Israeli prison—more than 10 years of that sentence in solitary confinement—for whistleblowing to the world in 1986 that Israel possessed nuclear weapons.  I remember he moved in quick spurts on the court, he frequently used his shin to keep the ball in play, and he wore cargo pants.  More importantly, I remember a piece of advice that he delivered enthusiastically to the whole group.  It was a farewell party for an American activist-humanitarian couple, whose visas the Israeli government would not renew.  Palestinian, Israeli, American, and European friends alike toasted this couple, who were deeply disappointed that their service in the West Bank was coming to an unexpectedly quick end.  Mordechai got the last word, though.  He knew some things about hope and resistance.  “You have been here fighting the occupation.  But now and perhaps more importantly, as Americans, you must go home to fight the second occupation: the Israeli lobby’s occupation of the U.S. Congress!”  (Translation: A. “the Israeli occupation is enabled by the billions of dollars in U.S. aid every year and by vetoing UN resolutions; fix that”; B. “No matter your issue, fight where you have the most agency.”)
I visited the separation wall.  It’s hard not to.  It winds and imposes everywhere. I passed through the Qalandiya checkpoint.  I stopped by the Dheisheh refugee camp.  And, I walked down the eeriest emblem of the occupation: Shuhada Street in Hebron.  My U.S. passport meant that I could pass through these regions fairly easily, with the privilege of a poverty-tourist.  My U.S. passport also, Vanunu would hint, meant that I was complicit. 
Fight where you have agency.  Even if you do not have agency, fight nevertheless. 
A couple years after that pilgrimage-of-sorts, I met Cy Swartz.  Cy and his wife Lois were founding members of Bubbies and Zeydes for Peace, a small group of older Philadelphia-area Jews who advocated on behalf of Palestinian rights and held weekly vigils outside the Israeli consulate decrying the occupation of Palestine.  Area Quakers, Catholic Workers, atheists, and Penn and Temple students alike would join them.  
Cy died at the end of this summer.  I didn’t know him very well—we had only spent about ten hours together over the course of three years—but he taught me a lot by his fidelity and his grace.  He knew how to receive with a smile an angry middle finger from a passing motorist.  He knew how to show warmth to someone who yelled “ignorant asshole” at him.  When I received my first “out of my way, shithead” from an angry Philadelphian (I was not really in the way, for the record), I became flustered and then embarrassed at my sudden lack of courage and conviction.  Cy assured me with a chuckle and a quip that the not-so-gentleman must have had an important lunch date.  Cy had been standing outside of the consulate for years and had received death threats—and then the requisite police protection—in the earlier years, when criticism of Israel was even less popular.           
At the end of every vigil, Cy would gather us together in a circle and hold up a loaf of bread he brought.  The group would sing a simple tune of peace first in Hebrew, then in Arabic, and finally in English. He would break the bread and pass it along, for each of us to consume and pass along until it completed the circle.  I recall fondly those informal eucharists at 20th and JFK, more meaningful than most formal Eucharists I’ve been to.  Cy and Lois knew about hope and resistance.   

***
            It has been a bleak advent, as the horror show of the Trump presidency drags on.  This new illiterate Caesar, who didn't even know Israel was in the Middle East gives carte blanche to Netanyahu, his beloved new Herod.  “It’s something that has to be done.”  Meanwhile, on the domestic front, in an alternative ending to A Christmas Carol, real-estate Scrooge really sticks it to the Cratchits all the while telling them that this “big, beautiful” tax cut is for them.  In a sickening, dishonest display, Scrooge’s oligarchic friends-of-convenience in Congress lavish him with praise for his “leadership.”
 Mike Pence stood with Christian-Zionist dreams in his faux-steely eyes as Trump made his Jerusalem announcement.  But, Mike Pence has had to cancel his trip to Bethlehem.  He and the white American imperial Christianity he is the face of could not possibly understand the story of Bethlehem—the Bethlehem of today and that of 2000 years ago. Religious pilgrimages and religious ceremonies and religious stories are empty and self-serving when they do not connect to the present.
 “The hopes and fears of all the years are met in thee tonight.”
Bethlehem teaches us about hope and resistance.  We do not condone violence, but we support a people’s right to resist nonviolently.  Most Palestinian resistors have been practicing nonviolence consistently for the past thirty years even though you would not know it from most U.S. media which only highlights the violence.      

Mordechai Vanunu, Cy and Lois Swartz, Palestinians resisting in the West Bank and their Israeli allies.  These are the people that understand the Nativity.
And, Chelsea Manning and all whistleblowers.  And all transgender people living proudly in defiance of the Mike Pences of the world.  Tarana Burke and all #metoo women, from the famous to the farmworkers.  DREAMers.  Peace activists, conscientious objectors, and good military people still in and ready to disobey unlawful orders.  Saudi women gaining the right to drive, if not much else.  Working people, with two to three jobs, organizing instead of giving in to Trump’s racialized southern strategy.  Standing Rock.  People battling cancer, even as their health care is wrested from them.  The People’s Organization for Progress on their 99th consecutive “Justice Monday” in Newark (photos below).  Those police officers in Newark and elsewhere who protect our first amendment rights and serve us well and who do not see calls for police reform as personal affronts.  The Mennonite farmers near Lancaster we visited last week who have lived on the land for generations, new young urban farmers trying to get healthy food to city kids, and suburban horticulturalists cultivating their own gardens in between.  Parents trying to raise kids and take care of their own dying parents.  These countless people living with dignity—the leaven, the mustard seeds—in an undignified time.  From Bethlehem, Palestine to Bethlehem, Pennsylvania and all the little towns of Bethlehem in between.  Fighting where they have agency and even when they have none. All these people are the shepherds.  These are the wise (wo)men.  These are the friendly beasts around the manger.  These are the lights in the darkness.  These are the reasons to believe and the reasons to resist and persist.  
It is an undignified time indeed, yet still....

“The Risk of Birth, An Advent Poem”
This is no time for a child to be born,
With the earth betrayed by war & hate
And a comet slashing the sky to warn
That time runs out & the sun burns late.
That was no time for a child to be born,
In a land in the crushing grip of Rome;
Honour & truth were trampled by scorn–
Yet here did the Saviour make his home.
When is the time for love to be born?
The inn is full on the planet earth,
And by a comet the sky is torn–
Yet Love still takes the risk of birth.
Madeleine L'Engle, 1973