Saturday, November 15, 2025

Shore town homily

“The Gospel of the Lord.”

“Praise to you Lord Jesus Christ.”


The congregation sat down.  The deacon walked to his seat from the pulpit, and Father walked to the pulpit from his seat.  He welcomed the new and the returning congregants.  He noted all the families seated together and said that that was good.  It was good to be together, Father emphasized.  He summarized the passage from Luke that the deacon had just read.  It was the parable of the rich man storing grain in his barns.  Father talked about how sharing among siblings is hard but important.  He noted the little siblings seated together and said that that was good.  Better to learn how to share when you are younger, he said with a smile.  He shared two stories of non-sharing from his own childhood, one where he was the perpetrator and one where he was the victim.  The parents in the pews smiled.  A few laughed.  It was a beautiful morning at the shore.  

Father then widened the scope of his homily.  He mentioned a report he read on the mental health of the ultra-wealthy.  It turns out, Father said, that the very rich in society are often the least happy.  He noted that this might be counterintuitive for many but that when we are defined by and attached to our possessions, we can never have enough and that makes us unhappy.  He moved to conclude, “Let us remember, that our possessions do not make us happy.”

Father took a short pause.  Internally, the pause seemed an eternity.  Did he just ruin vacation?  Did he now hear waves crashing?  A storm brewing?  Father looked at the pews.  Did he make a mistake?  He couldn’t tell.  

He decided to save the town and himself, from himself.  And so, Father, added, “It’s not that possessions are bad.  We can have possessions.  It is bad when we attach to them, or to anything.”

The seas calmed.  The smiling parents exhaled, Father imagined.

He had saved himself and the town, which would soon make its way toward communion and then later back to their houses and to the beach and then back to the rest of their lives, in the blissful sun among their possessions.  Praise to you, Lord Jesus Christ.


Tuesday, November 11, 2025

"Do not engage with Pax Christi"

Delivered at Pax Christi Metro New York Fall Assembly

(forgive all grammatical errors, as this was written to be spoken) 


November 1, 2025

The first time I heard of Pax Christi, it was in the form of a warning: “Don’t engage with Pax Christi,” I was told.  It was 2000 and early 2001.  I was a 4/C midshipman, that is, a freshman navy ROTC student at Notre Dame.  It was the lead up to the annual “pass in review,” a parade of the three ROTC branches in front of the university administration.  Student members of Pax Christi, led by that rabble rouser priest Mike Baxter, had the audacity to suggest, in the school newspaper, and in small protests, that Notre Dame should not have a military parade on the main quad.  

Pax Christi won, sort of.  They wanted there to be no parade at all, and no ROTC units on campus.  The compromise was that the parade was to be held indoors, again, at the Loftus Center.  

“Do not engage,” our commanding officer told us, particularly when in uniform.  

I still remember walking into the Loftus Center, in my summer whites, and there were Pax Christi and Pax Christi-adjacent students on both sides of the walkway.  I didn’t engage.  I didn’t make eye contact.  I looked forward, steely-eyed, as if I was already marching in the parade.  


Because of the uniforms, because of the parades, because of the army-navy game, and flyovers and air shows, because of the tulips in the Annapolis brochure, and national anthems and pledges of allegiance, because of Tom Clancy and Jack Ryan, Tom Cruise and Top Gun, …..by ninth grade I knew I wanted to go into the military.  I could not articulate a strong reason other than “I wanted to serve my country,” and it was “an honorable path.”  Why the navy specifically?... I felt there was a “romance of the sea,” and also all the best military movies, I thought, were navy-centered.  They got me.

9/11 took place my sophomore year, a couple weeks after I signed on the line to confirm my commitment, and that day only affirmed my resolve to “serve.”  

I had accepted the so called “common sense” behind the war in Afghanistan.  I didn’t want to throw snow balls at the tents on South Quad like fellow midshipman Ryan Long joked about doing--tents erected by Pax Christi students to highlight the plight of Afghan refugees, made by our war .  I thought these students were highlighting an important humanitarian concern.  Concerns I would take with me when I would go to war.  I could thread this needle, As the moderate philosopher-officer.

However, watching the Iraq war unfold, especially while I studied abroad in Cairo, away from the cheerleading US media: That’s when the cracks started forming in that resolve.  

Coming back from Cairo and then spending my midshipman summer on a ship out of San Diego was disorienting.  No one questioned the war.  They cheered it on, to the degree they even thought about it.  In the surface navy, we were at the same time part of the larger war machine but not really in harm’s way ourselves.  Arm chair warriors of a sort. But because the particular ship I was on was not firing missiles, I had convinced myself that I could keep on threading this needle.

My senior year, I still kept my distance from Pax Christi.  But I did start hanging out with Catholic Worker types.  I was being drawn in by something stronger and better than the military propaganda that hooked me in my teens .

And so I would continue to struggle with this moral dilemma out in the actual navy--and hold that tension.

I still thought that the navy could use an enlightened officer like me.  I was becoming more fluent in Arabic, I studied Islam and so-called Middle East history, I was a good liberal.  Not like those Bush and Cheney-ite brutes.  I was Notre Dame-Catholic-educated, where the “values” I learned in--I guess liturgy? In theology class?--would automatically make me make the right decision.  I could help the navy be less brutish, and if push came to shove, I would not participate in an unjust invasion.  Or an unjust missile launch.

In fact, I chose to go to the Middle East, closer to the crucible in Iraq, to a minesweeper in Bahrain.  Wouldn’t it be better for me to go that way, since I was studying the language and the region?  That tour of duty was supposed to be 27 months but then after two months, we got called to rotate back to Texas, near Corpus Christi.  But not before I , in fine colonial fashion,  attended a couple all-you-can-eat-and-champagne-drink brunches at the Radisson, with all the fellow off-duty officers, military contractors, and occasional wealthy Bahrainis and Saudis, all of us served by “Third Country Nationals,” i.e. underpaid S. and SE Asian guest workers.  

Corpus Christi, the body of Christ, working onboard a broken ship, tied to the pier--that would be the actual crucible that formed me.  We weren’t going anywhere, but we were ruled by our own Captain Ahab.  From the top came the cut throat anxiety, Dehumanizing coerced labor, and often racialized language.  Ahab acted as if we were at the “tip of the spear,” and this was made all the more absurd, because our broken little boat was so insignificant even by the navy’s own metrics.  

After a long hot day of both extreme boredom and despair, if I didn’t have duty, I’d stop at the empty and open church on the way back home, to look for some rest. Our Lady of the Assumption. There, of all the things to turn to, I turned to the rosary.  The rosary!?  I was a liberal Catholic--I didn’t do the rosary.  But that forced repetition of prayers became like a mantra that eventually led me into deeper and regular contemplation.

It was in contemplation where I sat with the reality that I was part of the war machine and it was going to be hard to survive it.  And that it might break me.  The far edge of it, but nevertheless part of the machine.  Even for those who like the military, life in it is totalitarian, all consuming.  

My dear friend Tami subscribed me to the Fellowship of Reconciliation magazine.  Margie from the Catholic Worker sent me books on the murdered El Salvador Jesuits.  Bill and Brendan sent me Dan Berrigan, Dorothy Day, and John Dear.  One day, at the gun range no less, I was reading Michael Nagler’s Is There No Other Way?  The search for a nonviolent future.  

When he saw the book, my friend Ted, said with humor and kindness, “I think you’re in the wrong line of work.”

I found the one alternative, hippie coffee shop in Corpus, where I befriended Blue Feather, who became my Navajo spiritual healer and I his adopted grandson of sorts.  I heard the music of David Rovics, and his “San Patricio Battalion.”  I picked up Zinn and Chomsky from the library.  I’d go to the beautiful Corpus Christi bay at night and stare off in peace.  Beautiful despite the refineries.  Then the next morning, I’d have to go face the ugly gray ship and the ugly captain.  

In the summer of 2005, I began assembling an application for conscientious objection.  I first told my parents and my closest friends, and they were all supportive.  The base chaplain did not share my politics or my spirituality, but he was kind and was as supportive as he knew how to be.  In my personal statement, explaining the change between willingly signing up for the navy and now wanting to get out of it was hard.  How does one explain in a military application before what would be a military tribunal of sorts, that “long loneliness” Dorothy Day wrote about and lived.  Loneliness during the midnight to 4am watch, with a 9mm on my hip, despite cracking jokes with the watch team.  Loneliness during baseball game national anthems.  Loneliness during Captain Ahab’s speeches.  And loneliness during suburban Catholic homilies that did not challenge the war culture.

I had assembled the letters of support.  I had Ben at the Catholic Worker, who also worked with the GI Rights hotline, review the application.  It was ready to go, for Thursday, August 18.  That was my goal.

On the Monday before--the 15th--I was called into the XO’s office.  Did the chaplain leak my plans?

The XO offered me a new position on the ship: “first lieutenant,” or deck division officer.  Andy was leaving for dive school, his position was now open, and the XO thought I might like this better than being the “Auxiliary engines officer” or “auxo.”  He knew I hated being Auxo.  “First LT” was definitely a better position, and with that, I could run the fitness and morale, welfare, and rec programs.  

I said yes.  I took it the XO’s invitation as a sign--but probably more of an out.  An out to avoid any such sign.  I would not submit my application for CO.  I would clench my jaw, plug away, and get out in three years.   

I no longer believed that the navy was an institution that could be reformed from within, certainly not by a junior office like me.  But, if ever I would have to commit an immoral act, I told myself, I would stop then.  I would risk it all then.  I resigned myself to being part of the war machine, because it was a broken part of the machine, tied to the pier. 

For my second and final tour, I decided to go to a cruiser, based out of Japan.  I didn’t yet have the analysis to name my role in Japan--or Bahrain, or Tejas for that matter--as occupier.  Nor to see the violence in just my being there, in US military uniform.  

In addition to the just grueling life at sea--the USS Cowpens actually worked and we were out to sea a lot--several experiences from that tour stand out:

Doing circles off the coast of Taiwan during its elections; visiting Hiroshima and eerie peace of the A-bomb dome at night; a boozy brunch in Okinawa--doubly colonized by Japan and then the US; a sailor from our ship murdering a Japanese taxi cab driver; protesters greeting us in Sydney--reminiscient of Pax Christi at Notre Dame six years; I didn’t engage this time either, but by then, I wanted to actually join them.  

And then one seemingly small thing still stands out, from the Cowpens’ history on the brochure for the friends and family day cruise.

“The USS Cowpens fired 37 missiles during the ‘shock and awe’ phase of ‘Operation Iraqi Freedom’”

It was written as an accolade for the ship, a milestone in its history.  For our friends and families to soak in as they walked the passage ways and enjoyed hamburgers on the back of the ship.

Three years had gone by between those 37 missiles and my arrival on the Cowpens, but the connections--and the entanglement in this filthy rotten system--was made clear.

I got out of the navy in 2008.  In the years since, I have become an active member of Veterans for Peace and About Face: Veterans against the war (formerly IVAW).  I now teach high school and try to have soft counter-recruiting conversations with my students, who live in an over-recruited district. Soft, because for many of them, it is their only economic option.  I can’t judge them.  After all, I did it, and I didn’t get out even when I maybe should have.

So, I didn’t submit that CO application.  Did I get cold feet or was I not truly a CO?  I think both are true.  

If I submitted the application, everything in my life would have been upended, at least for a time, and I lacked the courage to face the shame, real or imagined, of being “that guy who didn’t finish their time.” How could I explain that long loneliness to everyone? 

And while war is always sinful and can hardly ever be just and while I have dedicated my life to stopping war, I’m not entirely a pacifist.  I don’t know if I would have preached pacifism to Nat Turner or to Marek Edelman of the Warsaw Ghetto.  But maybe I can hold those two contradictory truths at the same time.  So I don’t know if I was actually a CO.

As I close, I did want to introduce a new campaign led by About Face, and this is the “Right to Refuse.”  We are working with the Military Law Task Force, Veterans for Peace and other allies to build legal protections around the right to refuse unjust military orders.  In the immediate, we have the deployment of national guard troops to our streets in mind.  But also, we are thinking of the current extrajudicial killings happening in the Caribbean and a potential larger US war on Venezuela.  The “right to refuse” would establish a sort of “selective conscientious objector” legal status.

It is obviously a tall task.  We don’t believe in veteran epistemology--that we necessarily have some special knowledge and that people should listen to what we say.  But, nevertheless, many Americans do worship vets (which is weird), and so this is our lane in the current struggle.  We see the R2R campaign as an organizing strategy too, along the way, to make some cracks in this fascism enveloping our country.  But Pax Christi--and About Face-- and folks here know that our crisis is much deeper than Trump.  


Saturday, October 4, 2025

In defense of "Harrisburg"

 Oct. 1, 2025

Hello Mr. _______and friends,

My name is Terry Fitzgibbons.  I’m a proud 2000 graduate of LaSalle.  Many family members and friends are graduates and have worked with LaSalle and LaSallian institutions.  I attended my 25-year reunion in April.  I cherish my high school memories, and I enjoy updates from Wyndmoor.  Thank you for your newsletter
I write, however, because I am concerned with the increasing anti-"Harrisburg" messages that have been coming from the newsletter.  Item #2 from today (Vol. 7, No. 2, Oct. 2025) reads, "Don't give your money to Harrisburg--Support LaSalle."  In my view, this emphasis is harmful and even contravenes the spirit of the founder, St. Jean-Baptiste de la Salle.  
In addition to the privilege of attending LaSalle, I attended Catholic school from kindergarten through eighth grade, and also I attended Catholic higher education.  Growing up, though, we always understood that our private/Catholic schooling should not be viewed in competition with public education, or public goods more broadly.  While we would debate exactly what our taxes should pay for, we always understood that our taxes should, in the first place, pay for public goods, in order to ensure a healthy civic life.  That is, taxation was/is the price of living in a civilization.  Attending LaSalle or donating to LaSalle did not excuse us from those obligations.  
While I am not currently a beneficiary of "Harrisburg," I am a beneficiary of "Trenton."  My neighbors and I use public roads and public transportation, use public libraries, visit public parks, use public healthcare when available, and we send our kids to public schools.  We believe that a healthy, functioning democracy must provide public goods and that these can only be secured through fair and just taxation. We do not view Catholic--or Jewish or Muslim, for that matter--institutions as competition but as part of the rich social fabric.  But, much of that social fabric must be public and accessible for all.  
At a time when our democracy teeters on the edge and when fascistic forces abound, I don't believe it is wise to denigrate "Harrisburg" (or "Trenton") broadly.  
I now teach public school myself, and my students are all low-income.  They are the beneficiaries of taxes going to Trenton and coming back to serve them.  I believe they are the young people whom St. Jean-Baptiste de la Salle would stand in solidarity with, no matter their creed.  They, in turn, will join the workforce and pay taxes to support public goods themselves.  It is a virtuous cycle when done well and fairly. 
Finally, it is well documented that wealthy individuals and institutions avoid taxes through such donation schemes as Pennsylvania's EITC/OSTC.  At a time of obscene wealth inequality--a trend of the past 45 years but heightened in the past year--we should not be encouraging tax avoidance.
I understand that my interpretation and response might sound like hyperbole.  In the context of already existing inequality, I understand the EITC/OSTC is meant to serve Pennsylvania's neediest students, and I understand LaSalle does some good outreach and provides generous financial aid to needy families, and that is good.  I personally would advocate for different policies, but I understand you don't make or advocate for policy, and it only makes sense that you would take advantage of policies that would benefit the institution of LaSalle and also benefit needy students.  
Is it possible, however, to pursue that while not denigrating "Harrisburg" broadly?  Without good, common public goods, our social fabric will continue to fray, and demagogues will continue to take advantage of a hollowed-out public.  We need not pit LaSalle's private growth against the necessary public goods that most of the rest of us rely on.  
Thank you for listening.  I appreciate your consideration, and I wish you all the best this school year.
Live Jesus in our hearts, Forever!
-Terry Fitzgibbons '00 

Thursday, August 14, 2025

Farewell, war fighters (August 29, 2007)

 Written August 29, 2007, while standing Force Protection Action Officer in Port Kelang, Malaysia. Delivered June 2008, Yokosuka Naval Station, Officers' Club.

I had always wanted to be in the navy, believe it or not, since at least seventh grade.  I gave it my best shot and realized many times that it was not for me.  For many more details, I can mail you a copy of the book or direct you to the website.  And now it’s time to move on.  Everybody will have or has had their own experiences and will make his/her own conclusions about life in the navy.  And I respect that.

To all the avowed and secret members of the JOPA (Junior Officer Protection Agency):  Stay strong.  And remember, especially you James, you will survive.

And to everyone: I’ve been told by several people over the past four years that “at the end of the day, we are war fighters.”  I’ve heard my chief say to our people, “at the end of the day, DCA and I wear the khaki and what we say goes.”  I’ve heard, specifically several years ago when I was on my way to my own captain’s mast, “at the end of the day, he is the captain and what he says goes.”  And I’ve been told after the many times I’ve failed, “at the end of the day, it’s all about results.”

You may believe all this, and that is fine.  I do not believe it, however.

I believe at the end of the day the only thing that matters is that you tried your best.  I believe at the end of the day, there is no difference between the captain and me, between me and Fireman Martinez, between the Malaysian guy hooking up the CHT barge and you, between the Japanese SRF worker and the XO, and between you and me.  At the end of the day—or at least at the end of my day—we are not war fighters.  At the end of the day, we are human beings.  And we are all we have.  

I only hope I can remember this for the rest of my life.

And so, I end with this favorite prayer of mine, which is not only for my fellow JOPA members, but also for the department heads, warrants and LDOs, XO, and Captain, their wonderful families, (and even for the new folks we are welcoming this evening):


Mighty God, Father of All

Compassionate God, Mother of all

Bless every person I have met

Every face I have seen

Every voice I have heard

Especially those most dear;

Bless every city, town, and

Street that I have known,

Bless every sight I have seen,

Every sound I have heard,

Every object I have touched.

In some mysterious way these

Have all fashioned my life;

All that I am,

I have received.

Great God, bless the world. Amen.

    

While I won’t miss the navy, I am grateful that our paths have crossed and I hope 

they will again in the future.


Wednesday, August 6, 2025

The A-Bomb Dome and the Cherry Blossom (from 2018)

 The A-Bomb Dome and the Cherry Blossom

Good Friday

While in the navy stationed in Japan, I took the shinkansen from Yokohama to Hiroshima one weekend.  It happened to be Good Friday.  I had wanted to see Hiroshima since arriving in Japan for its unique place in our history, in our imagination, and in our psyche.  The city represents what we human beings are capable of.

On the morning of August 6, 1945, the U.S. B-29 bomber “Enola Gay,” named after the pilot’s mother, dropped the first atomic bomb “Little Boy” on Hiroshima, killing an estimated 80,000 instantly.  Three days later, the U.S. dropped “Fat Boy” on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 40,000 instantly.  Tens of thousands more people died later, and many more—the hibakusha, the survivors—lived with radiation sickness and other terrible wounds.  



One person who died of such effects later was Sadako Sasaki.  She was two years old the day of the bombing.  Even though she had no apparent initial injuries, nine years later she suddenly developed signs of leukemia, which had been caused by radiation exposure from the bomb.  With the hope that folding a thousand origami paper cranes would help her recover—a belief from Japanese legend—she made 644 of them in the eight months before she died.


Holy Saturday


I visited the Peace Memorial Museum on what was Holy Saturday.  Victims’ belongings, survivors’ testimonies, and other a-bombed artifacts mesmerized me and other visitors from around the world for hours.  I still recall, for instance, the analog watch eerily frozen at 8:16—the exact time its owner’s world and the world as a whole changed forever.  That image of the watch still grips me, the way the pile of shoes at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum or the victims’ voicemails at the 9/11 Museum still do.  

Outside, I walked along the Ota River and by the park’s fountains.  In the evening, I sat on a bench and held an impromptu Easter vigil of sorts, facing what was left of the Industrial Promotion Hall, now known as the “A-Bomb Dome.”  Although the hall was almost directly at the epicenter of the blast, its shell somehow survived complete destruction, and it now stands as a famous monument to that infamous day.  The dome stood softly lit, while I sat quietly, and the city was still.  If there are such things as ghosts, they were out that evening—perhaps every evening—in Hiroshima, that city of our collective consciousness.  



Much dying, and death as a whole, is unavoidable—both the physical dying of the body and the spiritual dying of the ego.  We would do better to welcome this death and dying, so Jesus and Christian teachers from Paul to Dorothy Day have taught us.  We would do better to accept death in order to better welcome resurrection: “Unless a grain of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains just a grain of wheat; but if it dies, it produces much fruit” (Jn 12:24).      

But, a particular death—early mass death, destruction, death before one’s time has come—is wholly avoidable.  Since Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the bombs have become more powerful and numerous.  In the event of a nuclear war, scientists warn of a nuclear winter.  With that type of potential death, where does resurrection even fit in?  Is it possible?  We thankfully have not had to find out, and yet we remain dangerously close to “doomsday.”  

  “The mere fact that we now seem to accept nuclear war as reasonable is a universal scandal,” Thomas Merton wrote in 1962.  Thirty-six years later, in "The End of Imagination," Indian author Arundhati Roy lamented on the occasion of her country obtaining the bomb: “The nuclear bomb is the most anti-democratic, anti-national, anti-human, outright evil thing that man has ever made. If you are religious, then remember that this bomb is man's challenge to God. It's worded quite simply: ‘We have the power to destroy everything that You have created.’”

It is a long Holy Saturday evening—a long Easter vigil—that we wait in, here on the precipice.  Is resurrection inevitable?  Is it faith to wait and hope for best?  Or must we “practice resurrection” as poet and farmer Wendell Berry beckons?   


Easter Sunday 

On Easter Sunday, I attended mass at the Assumption of Mary Cathedral, also known as the Memorial Cathedral of World Peace, a mile from the A-Bomb Dome.  Pope John Paul II had visited the city and the church in 1981.  There, he proclaimed, “All across the face of the earth, the names of very many—too many—places are remembered mainly because they have witnessed the horror and suffering produced by war, where nature has mercifully healed the earth’s scars, but without being able to blot out the past history of hate and enmity.”

After this worship, before getting back to my warship, I sat among the cherry blossoms, which were in full bloom.  Nature had indeed mercifully healed many of the earth’s scars.  The park was not quiet like the night before.  Families bustled and laughed along the scenic thoroughfare.  Life—one might say resurrection—was palpable.  




I walked one more time to the Children’s Peace Monument, which was filled with thousands of paper cranes.  Sadako Sasaki, the young girl who died of leukemia, had inspired her friends and schoolmates.  They helped raise money to build a memorial to her and all of the children who died from the atomic bombing.  A statue of Sasaki holding a golden crane stands in the park with the plaque that reads, “This is our cry.  This is our prayer.  For building peace in our world.”  Approximately 10 million cranes are sent from around the world each year to the Children’s Peace Monument. 

Hiroshima represents what we human beings are capable of: resurrection, practiced.  

Friday, January 3, 2025

Chickens come home to roost?

 As we near the inauguration of Trump 2.0…

Dear Liberal/Democrat friends concerned about growing fascism, authoritarianism, revanchism, and white supremacy yet who make the “exception for Palestine.”

I share your concerns about Trump and the right.  Many of the days ahead will be dark.

However, I don’t think you understand how fascism develops. (That is my charitable interpretation.)

Aside from the fact that supporting Palestine is the principled position, your silence (at best) during the past year (past 100 years), your “exception for Palestine” undermines all your other stated values, especially as you warn about fascism and “saving our democracy.”  

If you can make a convenient exception for indigenous Palestinians being eviscerated by an ethno-nationalist settler state—weapons provided by a Democratic administration—you will also make exceptions for further border militarization (under a Democratic administration), exceptions for homelessness criminalization in California (under a Democratic governor and Democratic mayors), or exceptions for “cop cities” (under Democratic city councils).  This is not to say that the two parties are the same.  This is to say that the selectivity of your outrage undermines your outrage.  

I currently don’t trust that you will fight fascism until it affects your property values and/or your ability to go on vacation and/or your kids’ ability to go to ___X____ university and reproduce your social class, if not rising to a higher class.  And maybe when fascism “arrives,” it actually won’t even affect your property values, etc.  If the “market” is still “good,” maybe you will thrive.  (That is my less charitable interpretation.)

***

“Whoever is not prepared to talk about capitalism should also remain silent about fascism,” Max Horkheimer, “The Jews and Europe,” 1939

Riff: “Whoever is not prepared to talk about imperialism should remain silent about fascism,” Nicos Poulantzas, “Fascism and Dictatorship,” 1974

Riff on riff: “Whoever is not willing to talk about settler colonialism should be quiet on fascism,” Alberto Toscano, “Israel, fascism, and the war against the Palestinian people,” 2023

***

I don’t know that the Dems would have won if they had supported an arms embargo on Israel or had any slightly just policy for Palestine.  Likely still not.  But I think stopping the genocide and supporting the liberation of Palestine are principled positions, regardless of electoral outcomes.

Aside from the basic moral value to not subjugate people, the destruction we sow aboard eventually destroys the institutions here.  The racial extraction and oppression in the colonies comes home to roost.  The illiberal exceptions we make eventually eat away our liberal democracy. Chickens Come Home to Roost: the U.S. Empire, the Surveillance State a | Verso Books

We have learned from history, from thinkers like Aimee Cesaire, Hannah Arendt, and Michel Foucault, to name a few, that the racialized and often gendered violence and repression we visit abroad in the (neo)colonies eventually boomerangs back to us.  

The murderous Nazi violence that came back to Europe in the 1930s had its antecedents and its formation in places like Namibia and Tanzania in the 1800s (and also less directly, but still cited by Hitler, in US slavery and Jim Crow and US genocide of Native Americans.)

And then one fine day the bourgeoisie is awakened by a terrific boomerang effect: the gestapos are busy, the prisons fill up, the torturers standing around the racks invent, refine, discuss.


People are surprised, they become indignant. They say: “How strange! But never mind – it’s Nazism, it will pass!” And they wait, and they hope; and they hide the truth from themselves, that it is barbarism, the supreme barbarism, the crowning barbarism that sums up the daily barbarisms; that it is Nazism, yes, but that before they were its victims, they were its accomplices; that they tolerated that Nazism before it was inflicted on them, that they absolved it, shut their eyes to it, legitimized it, because, until then, it had been applied only to non-European peoples; that they have cultivated that Nazism, that they are responsible for it, and that before engulfing the whole edifice of Western, Christian civilization in its reddened waters, it oozes, seeps and trickles from every crack. (Aimee Cesaire, Discourse on Colonialism)

**

In the weeks since the election, Democrats and liberals have not changed course.  (MAGA is meanwhile licking its lips for its chance.). In the weeks since, the House has passed resolutions “to terminate the tax-exempt status of terrorist supporting organizations.”  Do we not see how our complicity in Palestine sets the table for MAGA to come after other causes we care about?  In the weeks since the election, Democrats closed ranks with Republicans to stop an (all too late) weapons stoppage resolution in the Senate.  The US continues to veto ceasefire resolutions in the UN Security Council.

**

I ask you, which of us sitting in this hall would willingly submit to the indignity that Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank have been subjected to for decades? What peaceful means have the Palestinian people not tried? What compromises have they not accepted–other than the one that requires them to crawl on their knees and eat dirt? (Arundhati Roy PEN Pinter Prize acceptance speech)

While it’s very late, it’s never too late to get on the right side.  (I’m being charitable again.  We should all be charitable to each other)

So where do we start?We start with Palestine. 

Our struggle against MAGA fascism is tied to the struggle for Palestine.  The fanatic, brazen, fascist ethno-settler state of Israel is the dystopia that MAGA dreams of.  

Solidarity with Palestine is in fact a strategic lynch pin to our struggle against the right, capitalism, and empire.That must begin with principled defense of Palestine solidarity activists’ right to free speech, assembly, and organization. If they can deny these frontline fighters those rights, all of our rights will be in jeopardy. (Ashley Smith, https://tempestmag.org/2024/12/resisting-authoritarian-populism-pt2/)